In a somewhat predictable occurrence, I bought headphones on JetBlue (as I left my set somewhere in the Austin Convention Center) and they didn’t work in my computer/recorder so I am still without the text of the Lessig interview.
Netroots Nation was helpful by way of shining a light on Internet activism and action, though it felt a little long by the time Sunday rolled around. For those unfamiliar with the structure (ie. likely anyone who wasn’t there), the conference is part education, part networking opportunity, and part rally for the netroots generation. In retrospect, I find it unfortunate that I was unable to make the right wing net conference, also occurring in Austin over the weekend. It would have been particularly interesting to compare the attitude and atmospheres at each happening (although apparently Michelle Malkin there shouldn’t be a “self esteem problem” in the blogosphere of the right). I am also interested to find out whether or not, in the case of an Obama presidential victory, next year’s conference will be as large and energized without a campaign or a figure to rally around.
The panel that explored how video can help a cause/issue/campaign was great, though I had to leave it early. The milblog session was excellent, though somewhat disappointingly under-attended. It helped put into perspective how military use of blogs and other communication technologies are changing the perspectives of American’s with regard to what’s going on in Iraq. It was also inspiring to see that by way of VoteVets, exposure was shined on the poor living conditions at Fort Bragg, ultimately leading to political action.
Oh. And I was awed to see San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom, a true rockstar politician who garnered the stumbling attention of anyone with a pulse.
As per usual, there were so many interesting sessions and only so little time to see them all. As can be the case at conferences, some of the attitude was self-congradulatory, though that’s largely attributable to the fact that the conference isn’t strictly educational. Further, I wonder what these communities are ultimately going to gain by continuing to ask avid Internet activists year after year how we plan on bridging on and offline activism.
I do, though, think we need to talk differently about how we look at online action, new organizing, etc. Let’s just do it, as it were.
-Filed in Uncategorized
Christopher Colaninno
Further, I wonder what these communities are ultimately going to gain by continuing to ask avid Internet activists year after year how we plan on bridging on and offline activism.
Yeah, I had the same thought at times. It seemed like one of the times where you saying that needed to be said to some people, while others were basically the choir. There lots of people there that either were consciously combining on and off line activism already or people there that were basically traditional activists. I’m not activist rockstar but I’ve been attending protests, writing letters, and volunteering on campaigns for way longer then I’ve been blogging.
Only (small) answer I could think is the certain elements of the blogosphere could clap down the dailyshow like condescension at street protesters and their various antics.
July 22nd, 2008 at 8:51 amEmily
Funny, I live in SF and this was the first time I actually met Gavin Newsom! Maybe I shouldn’t admit that…
But you’re absolutely right about the overall attitude of the conference. It was very cheerleader at times, which was at least uplifting and made us all felt good. I sensed a general lack of solutions for the problem of bridging on- and off-line communications. There were some interesting sites proposed, but most of what I saw was still very net-centric. It will be interesting to see who comes up with the next big thing and makes herself rich. I’ve been wracking my brain, but no brilliant ideas yet.
July 22nd, 2008 at 10:45 am